Kit CB Roes
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Papers in
-
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 6
-
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 2
- Co-authors
- Mathieu van der Jagt (1 shared paper)Roos C. van der Mast (1 shared paper)Jozef Kesecioğlu (1 shared paper)Willem A. van Gool (1 shared paper)Marina L. H. Honing (1 shared paper)Michaël Kuiper (1 shared paper)Peter E. Spronk (1 shared paper)Arjen J. C. Slooter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Trials (2 papers)Statistical Methods in Medical Research (2 papers)Pharmacogenomics (2 papers)Systematic Reviews (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Kit CB Roes
12 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 215
- Developmental Neuroscience 93
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 106
- Statistics and Probability 37
- Neurology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Kit CB Roes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kit CB Roes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kit CB Roes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kit CB Roes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kit CB Roes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kit CB Roes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kit CB Roes. The network helps show where Kit CB Roes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kit CB Roes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 245 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 1 |
About Kit CB Roes
Kit CB Roes is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Pharmacology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Molecular Biology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (215 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (93 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (106 citations), Statistics and Probability (37 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). Kit CB Roes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mathieu van der Jagt, Roos C. van der Mast, Jozef Kesecioğlu, Willem A. van Gool, Marina L. H. Honing, Michaël Kuiper, Peter E. Spronk, Arjen J. C. Slooter, Attila Karakus and Ilan Irony. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Pharmacogenomics, Systematic Reviews and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.