King

18 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

King
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 89
  • Environmental Chemistry 65
  • Earth-Surface Processes 34
  • Paleontology 35
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 25
Replace Joseph W. Williams with:
Joseph W. Williams United States
Guy Hällfors Finland
Jörgen Olofsson Sweden
Hélène Horen France
Randall E. Kochevar United States
Antti Huusko Finland
Mario Cáceres Chile
Daphné Cuvelier Portugal
Kei Sato Japan
Haoru Chen China
King relative to Joseph W. Williams United States Joseph W. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Joseph W. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by King. The network helps show where King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with King Line = papers co-authored together King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1981119
2 199983
3 199948
4 199825
5 201519
6 200912
7
Recent Advances and Challenges of Visual Signa Quality Assessment
20138
8
The effect of particle-size distribution on the flotation of two South African coals
19866
9
The Dynamic Dance
20046
10 19984
11 20154
12
Boethius' Bearbeitung von Aristoteles' Schrift "De interpretatione"
19752
13 19862
14
Medicaid Survival Kit
19962
15 20202
16
Application of snowmelt runoff model (SRM) in mountainous watersheds: A review
20121
17
The policy-driven peak and reduction of China's carbon emissions
20201
18
Boethius' Bearbeitung der "Categoriae" des Aristoteles
19721
19 19851
20
20141

About King

King is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Classics, Water Science and Technology, Sociology and Political Science and Atmospheric Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (1 paper), Drilling and Well Engineering (1 paper) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (89 citations), Environmental Chemistry (65 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (34 citations), Paleontology (35 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (25 citations). King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Manuel Serra, Peter J. Havel, Schwartz, Seán Rooney, J E J Krige, Newman, Ma -, Deng Deng, Lin and Larry R. Myer. Their work appears in journals such as Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, The American Naturalist, Journal of Evolutionary Biology and British Journal of Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact