Kimberly R.M. Smith

44 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Kimberly R.M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Sensory Systems 215
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 602
  • Clinical Psychology 468
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 144
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 288
Replace Michal Hrdlička with:
Michal Hrdlička Czechia
Michael W. Green United Kingdom
Claire Curtis Canada
Marianne J. Moran United States
Kyle Stanley Burger United States
Petra Platte Germany
Kimberly A. Schreck United States
Jennifer A. Nasser United States
Gregory W. Yelland Australia
Cécile Rattaz France
Kimberly R.M. Smith relative to Michal Hrdlička Czechia Michal Hrdlička's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Michal Hrdlička · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly R.M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly R.M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly R.M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly R.M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly R.M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly R.M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly R.M. Smith. The network helps show where Kimberly R.M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kimberly R.M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kimberly R.M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Kimberly R.M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007152
2 2010146
3 2010118
4 2021113
5 2010111
6 201179
7 201172
8 202066
9 201163
10 200763
11 200757
12 201243
13 200839
14 200737
15 202135
16 201328
17 202126
18 202123
19 200522
20 201420

About Kimberly R.M. Smith

Kimberly R.M. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (8 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (8 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (215 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (602 citations), Clinical Psychology (468 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (144 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (288 citations). Kimberly R.M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Johnny L. Matson, Alan C. Spector, Yada Treesukosol, Susan Carnell, Gita Thapaliya, Jennifer R. Sadler, Elena Jansen, Jonathan W. Wilkins, Jessica A. Boisjoli and Timothy H. Moran. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Developmental Disabilities, Appetite, Nutrients, Surgical Endoscopy and American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact