Kimberly Fuller

444 citations
21 papers · 280 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kimberly Fuller

19 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Kimberly Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Social Psychology 124
  • Gender Studies 41
  • Reproductive Medicine 34
  • Clinical Psychology 54
  • General Health Professions 47
Replace Robert Salcido with:
Robert Salcido United States
Sarah Herbert New Zealand
Meredith Klepper United States
Emily Allen Paine United States
Laura Guidry‐Grimes United States
Julia A. Puckett United States
Natalie Amos Australia
Cindy J. Chang United States
Laura Bogaert Canada
Kathleen Buehler United States
Kimberly Fuller relative to Robert Salcido United States Robert Salcido's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert Salcido · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Fuller. The network helps show where Kimberly Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kimberly Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kimberly Fuller Line = papers co-authored together Kimberly Fuller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201877
2 200450
3 201724
4 202019
5 202219
6 201917
7 201813
8 201713
9 20178
10 20208
11 20188
12 20207
13 20224
14 20233
15 20223
16 20242
17 20232
18 20212
19 20061
20 20240

About Kimberly Fuller

Kimberly Fuller is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (124 citations), Gender Studies (41 citations), Reproductive Medicine (34 citations), Clinical Psychology (54 citations) and General Health Professions (47 citations). Kimberly Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Damien W. Riggs, Gregory W. Hendey, Linda Quinn, Cyleste Collins, LeaAnne DeRigne, Philip A. Rutter, Elizabeth A. Goncy, Shereen C. Naser, Patricia Stoddard‐Dare and Nicole I. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology in the Schools, International Journal of Transgender Health, Journal of Trauma Nursing, PLoS ONE and Journal of GLBT Family Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact