Kim Mitchell

738 citations
9 papers · 651 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kim Mitchell

9 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Kim Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Electrochemistry 250
  • Bioengineering 165
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 267
  • Polymers and Plastics 140
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 370
Replace Joshua D. Joseph with:
Joshua D. Joseph United States
Elizabeth S. Bucher United States
E. R. Strope United States
M.P. Brazell United Kingdom
Amina S. Khan United States
Richard J. Kasser United States
Yibai Hu United States
Paul L. Walsh United States
Fiachra B. Bolger Ireland
Yoonbae Oh United States
Kim Mitchell relative to Joshua D. Joseph United States Joshua D. Joseph's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Joshua D. Joseph · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Mitchell. The network helps show where Kim Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Kim Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Kim Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1994225
2 1990157
3 2004127
4 199850
5 200136
6 199431
7 199312
8 199311
9 19932

About Kim Mitchell

Kim Mitchell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electrochemistry, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (1 paper), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (250 citations), Bioengineering (165 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (267 citations), Polymers and Plastics (140 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (370 citations). Kim Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elias K. Michaelis, Ralph N. Adams, George S. Wilson, Fakhrildeen Albahadily, Yibai Hu, P. Capella, Christopher S. Leonard, Arvin F. Oke, M. Behnam Ghasemzadeh and Carol A. Rouzer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Brain Research, Electroanalysis, Biochemical Pharmacology and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact