Countries where authors publish in Electroanalysis
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electroanalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electroanalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electroanalysis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Electroanalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electroanalysis.
About Electroanalysis
The 9.4k papers published in Electroanalysis in the last decades have received a total of 224.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Electroanalysis usually cover Electrochemistry (5.9k papers), Bioengineering (4.2k papers), Polymers and Plastics (1.7k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (6.2k papers) and Analytical Chemistry (621 papers) specifically the topics of Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (5.9k papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (5.4k papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4.2k papers), Conducting polymers and applications (1.7k papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1.6k papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (843 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (395 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (386 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electroanalysis are Joseph Wang, Alain Walcarius, J. Justin Gooding, Richard G. Compton, Arkady A. Karyakin, Itamar Willner, Eugenii Katz, Lo Gorton, Kurt Kalcher and Yuehe Lin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.