Kim Borg

33 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

Kim Borg
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Marketing 132
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 110
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 74
  • Strategy and Management 90
  • Health 42
Replace José‐Julián Escario with:
José‐Julián Escario Spain
Chris von Borgstede Sweden
Paula Vicente Portugal
David Watson United Kingdom
Haemi Kim United States
Gregory O. Thomas United Kingdom
Jim Curtis Australia
Lukas Parker Australia
Елена Сауткина United Kingdom
Meike Morren Netherlands
Kim Borg relative to José‐Julián Escario Spain José‐Julián Escario's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
José‐Julián Escario · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Borg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Borg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Borg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Borg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Borg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Borg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Borg. The network helps show where Kim Borg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kim Borg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Borg Line = papers co-authored together Kim Borg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202278
2 202172
3 202070
4 201858
5 201852
6 201935
7 202226
8 201819
9 202018
10 202017
11 202116
12 200414
13
The Online Panels Benchmarking Study: A Total Survey Error Comparison of Findings from Probability-Based Surveys and Non-Probability Online Panel Surveys in Australia
201814
14 201913
15 201813
16 202112
17 202011
18 20219
19
Victorians Value Nature: Survey Results
20199
20 20218

About Kim Borg

Kim Borg is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (10 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (8 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (3 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers) and Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (132 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (110 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (74 citations), Strategy and Management (90 citations) and Health (42 citations). Kim Borg has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Liam Smith, Jim Curtis, Peter Bragge, Jo Lindsay, Mark Boulet, Stefan Kaufman, Nicholas Faulkner, Céline Klemm, Alyse Lennox and Gamithri Gayana Karunasena. Their work appears in journals such as Health Research Policy and Systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, Environmental Communication, Biodiversity and Conservation and New Media & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact