Kim

1.1k citations
6 papers · 909 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Kim

3 papers receiving 845 citations

Kim's Hit Papers

Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective1 2009 · 879 citations
8790+5+11Years since publication250500750

Peers

Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Information Systems and Management 449
  • Management Information Systems 182
  • Communication 119
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 113
  • Marketing 98
Replace Russell Torres with:
Russell Torres United States
Saad G. Yaseen Jordan
Xunhua Guo China
Osama Isaac Malaysia
Helana Scheepers Australia
Nazım Taşkın New Zealand
Mazen El-Masri Qatar
John Benamati United States
Virginia Ilie United States
Yaser Hasan Al‐Mamary Saudi Arabia
Kim relative to Russell Torres United States Russell Torres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Russell Torres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim. The network helps show where Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Line = papers co-authored together Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective1
Hit paper breakdown →
2009879
2 200725
3 20145
4 20170
5 20150
6 20110

About Kim

Kim is a scholar working on Communication, Automotive Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Social Psychology and Management Information Systems, having authored 6 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper), Workplace Violence and Bullying (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (449 citations), Management Information Systems (182 citations), Communication (119 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (113 citations) and Marketing (98 citations). Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Atreyi Kankanhalli and До. Their work appears in journals such as MIS Quarterly, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research and Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact