Kevin E. Staub

28 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

Kevin E. Staub
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 135
  • Health 99
  • Economics and Econometrics 296
  • General Decision Sciences 14
  • Social Psychology 146
Replace Vito Peragine with:
Vito Peragine Italy
Meng‐Wen Tsou Taiwan
Stefano Pettinato United States
Didier Blanchet France
Tony Atkinson United Kingdom
Lisa Dettling United States
Máximo Rossi Uruguay
Néstor Gándelman Uruguay
Thomas Cornelißen Germany
Chih Ming Tan United States
Kevin E. Staub relative to Vito Peragine Italy Vito Peragine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Vito Peragine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kevin E. Staub

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin E. Staub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin E. Staub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin E. Staub more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin E. Staub

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin E. Staub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin E. Staub. The network helps show where Kevin E. Staub may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Kevin E. Staub, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kevin E. Staub Line = papers co-authored together Kevin E. Staub links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014261
2 201183
3 202076
4 201253
5 201552
6 201051
7 201634
8
Trade Preferences and Bilateral Trade in Goods and Services: A Structural Approach
201232
9 202029
10 200917
11 201317
12 201016
13 202013
14 201210
15 202210
16 20209
17 20218
18
Robust estimation of zero-inflated count models
20097
19 20216
20 20113

About Kevin E. Staub

Kevin E. Staub is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Statistics and Probability, having authored 30 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (5 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), Global Health Care Issues (4 papers) and Global trade and economics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (135 citations), Health (99 citations), Economics and Econometrics (296 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations) and Social Psychology (146 citations). Kevin E. Staub has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Winkelmann, Gregori Baetschmann, Peter Egger, Mario Larch, Johannes Kunz, Christopher L. Skeels, Cliona Ní Mhurchú, Tony Blakely, Bruce Neal and Stefan Boes. Their work appears in journals such as Health Economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Health Economics, Economics Letters and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact