Kenneth Ritchie

865 citations
7 papers · 747 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Kenneth Ritchie

7 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

Kenneth Ritchie
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Biophysics 64
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
  • Structural Biology 13
  • Cell Biology 138
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 132
Replace Praveen D. Chowdary with:
Praveen D. Chowdary United States
Yoshiko Takenaka Japan
Suman Nag India
Frida Ryttsén Sweden
Sophie Pautot United States
Minhajuddin Sirajuddin India
Nir Kalisman Israel
Laurence Duchesne France
Nicholas Ian Cade United Kingdom
Anton A. Shemetov United States
Kenneth Ritchie relative to Praveen D. Chowdary United States Praveen D. Chowdary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Praveen D. Chowdary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Ritchie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Ritchie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Ritchie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Ritchie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Ritchie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Ritchie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Ritchie. The network helps show where Kenneth Ritchie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Ritchie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth Ritchie Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth Ritchie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2003292
2 1992155
3 2009104
4 200887
5 199057
6 199632
7 200820

About Kenneth Ritchie

Kenneth Ritchie is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biophysics, Cell Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 7 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heat shock proteins research (2 papers), thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (2 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (1 paper), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (1 paper), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (64 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations), Structural Biology (13 citations), Cell Biology (138 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (132 citations). Kenneth Ritchie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James R. Lepock, Jack Kruuv, Chieko Nakada, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Rinshi S. Kasai, Takahiro K Fujiwara, Kazuhiko Yamaguchi, Akihiro Kusumi, Yoko Hotta and Ryota Iino. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Biochemistry, Journal of Cellular Physiology and Cell Stress and Chaperones.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact