Ken Kojima

1.2k citations
39 papers · 686 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Kojima

38 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Ken Kojima
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Sensory Systems 478
  • Developmental Neuroscience 109
  • Otorhinolaryngology 45
  • Neurology 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 131
Replace M. De Silva with:
M. De Silva Australia
Nopporn Jongkamonwiwat Thailand
Rodrigo Martinez‐Monedero United States
Leif Järlebark Sweden
Bryony Coleman Australia
Marja Boström Sweden
P. L. Marzella Australia
Aziz Hafidi France
Suoqiang Zhai China
Ken Kojima relative to M. De Silva Australia M. De Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
M. De Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Kojima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Kojima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Kojima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Kojima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Kojima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Kojima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Kojima. The network helps show where Ken Kojima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Kojima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Kojima Line = papers co-authored together Ken Kojima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200785
2 200368
3 200559
4 200851
5 198540
6 200439
7 200836
8 200933
9 200430
10 200526
11 200623
12 201221
13 200719
14 200919
15 200418
16 200416
17 200713
18 200412
19 200711
20 200510

About Ken Kojima

Ken Kojima is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 39 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (20 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (4 papers), Congenital heart defects research (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (478 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (109 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (45 citations), Neurology (81 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (131 citations). Ken Kojima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Juichi Ito, Masahiro Matsumoto, Takayuki Nakagawa, Tetsuji Sekiya, Tae Soo Kim, Shinji Takebayashi, Tasuku Honjo, Norio Yamamoto, Tetsuya Tamura and T. Sakamoto. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, Neuroreport and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact