Ken Gatter

29 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Ken Gatter
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Genetics 123
  • Hematology 130
  • Dermatology 80
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 89
  • Rheumatology 75
Replace Atsushi Notoya with:
Atsushi Notoya Japan
M. Yadira Hurley United States
Nikhil Sangle United States
Therese White United States
Hiromi Koiso Japan
Susan R. Pilat United States
Nielsaage Tøffner Clausen Denmark
Mitsutoshi Kurosawa Japan
Annette M. May Germany
Goretta Bonacorsi Italy
Ken Gatter relative to Atsushi Notoya Japan Atsushi Notoya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Atsushi Notoya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Gatter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Gatter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Gatter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Gatter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Gatter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Gatter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Gatter. The network helps show where Ken Gatter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Gatter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Gatter Line = papers co-authored together Ken Gatter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200378
2 201546
3 201635
4 201734
5 200632
6 201028
7 201527
8 201025
9 200425
10 200523
11 200423
12 201023
13 200518
14 200518
15 201217
16 201016
17 202112
18 200211
19 20119
20 20178

About Ken Gatter

Ken Gatter is a scholar working on Oncology, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Hematology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (7 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (4 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (123 citations), Hematology (130 citations), Dermatology (80 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (89 citations) and Rheumatology (75 citations). Ken Gatter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rita M. Braziel, Susan B. Olson, Helen J. Lawce, Clifton R. White, Richard T. Maziarz, Guang Fan, James P. Dolan, Gina M. Vaccaro, Katalin Kelemen and John G. Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, British Journal of Haematology and American Journal of Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact