Ken Day

900 citations
19 papers · 737 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Forestry top 1%
    • Pasture and Agricultural Systems
    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Papers in

Ken Day

18 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Ken Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Forestry 207
  • Soil Science 158
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 180
  • Global and Planetary Change 297
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 120
Replace Grant Stone with:
Grant Stone Australia
Peter O’Reagain Australia
G. M. McKeon Australia
Hennie A. Snyman South Africa
J. C. Scanlan Australia
Steven Bray Australia
Hongwei Wan Germany
W. H. Burrows Australia
Santiago Baeza Uruguay
Daniel Tiveau Burkina Faso
Ken Day relative to Grant Stone Australia Grant Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Grant Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Day. The network helps show where Ken Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Day Line = papers co-authored together Ken Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009174
2 1990166
3 2002144
4 200066
5 199938
6 202034
7 201731
8 200020
9 200719
10 202412
11 20119
12 20096
13 20105
14
Climate Tools for Northern Grassy Landscapes
20004
15
Climate change impacts on Australia's rangeland livestock carrying capacity: a review of issues
20093
16
Historical degradation episodes in Australia: Global climate and economic forces and their interaction with rangeland grazing systems
20043
17 20102
18 20231
19 20230

About Ken Day

Ken Day is a scholar working on Forestry, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Soil Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pasture and Agricultural Systems (10 papers), Climate variability and models (5 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (4 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (207 citations), Soil Science (158 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (180 citations), Global and Planetary Change (297 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (120 citations). Ken Day has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Howden, Greg McKeon, D. M. Orr, J. J. Mott, G. M. McKeon, E. J. Weston, William J. Parton, W. B. Hall, Dennis S. Ojima and Jozef Syktus. Their work appears in journals such as Ecosphere, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Environmental Modelling & Software, Journal of Biogeography and Carbon Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact