Peter O’Reagain

720 citations
19 papers · 631 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter O’Reagain

19 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Peter O’Reagain
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Forestry 148
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 155
  • Ecology 207
  • Soil Science 123
  • Environmental Chemistry 42
Replace Ken A. Day with:
Ken A. Day Australia
Jeff P. Corfield Australia
Jorge Gonzalo N. Irisarri Argentina
J.O. Carter Australia
Gregory M. McKeon Australia
Grant S. Stone Australia
J. C. Scanlan Australia
K. L. Greenwood Australia
Pablo Baldassini Argentina
Guixia Yang China
Peter O’Reagain relative to Ken A. Day Australia Ken A. Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Ken A. Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter O’Reagain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter O’Reagain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter O’Reagain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter O’Reagain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter O’Reagain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter O’Reagain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter O’Reagain. The network helps show where Peter O’Reagain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter O’Reagain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter O’Reagain Line = papers co-authored together Peter O’Reagain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201176
2 201374
3 201270
4 200964
5 201463
6
Synthesis of evidence to support the scientific consensus statement on the water quality in the Great Barrier Reef
200843
7 201141
8 200738
9 201730
10 200023
11
Scientific Consensus Statement on Water Quality in the Great Barrier Reef
200821
12 201221
13 201517
14 201416
15 201616
16 200810
17 20216
18
Sustainable and profitable grazing management in a highly variable environment-evidence and insights from a long term grazing trial in northern Australia.
20081
19 20101

About Peter O’Reagain

Peter O’Reagain is a scholar working on Forestry, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Soil Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pasture and Agricultural Systems (8 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (8 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (2 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (2 papers) and Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (148 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (155 citations), Ecology (207 citations), Soil Science (123 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (42 citations). Peter O’Reagain has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Belgium and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John Bushell, N. W. Tomkins, Diane Elizabeth Allen, Ram C. Dalal, Steven Bray, Matthew J. Pringle, Joe C. Scanlan, Robyn Cowley, Leigh P. Hunt and Michael F. Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Production Science, Soil Research, Rangeland Ecology & Management, Agronomy and Pedobiologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact