Ken Booth

5.9k citations
159 papers · 3.3k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Booth

129 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Ken Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Political Science and International Relations 2.1k
  • Development 272
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.2k
  • General Energy 33
  • Gender Studies 221
Replace Gearóid Ó Tuathail with:
Gearóid Ó Tuathail United States
Barry R. Posen United States
Stephen M. Walt United States
Mary Kaldor United Kingdom
Christian Reus‐Smit Australia
Hedley Bull Australia
Alastair Iain Johnston United States
Paul F. Diehl United States
Daniel H. Nexon United States
Raymond Duvall United States
Ken Booth relative to Gearóid Ó Tuathail United States Gearóid Ó Tuathail's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Gearóid Ó Tuathail · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Booth. The network helps show where Ken Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Booth Line = papers co-authored together Ken Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994412
2 1991394
3 2007365
4 1996259
5 1982161
6 2005159
7 1991131
8 1995100
9 201871
10
Security and Self : Reflections of a Fallen Realist
199461
11
International relations theory today
199560
12 200258
13 200755
14 199944
15 199243
16 199541
17 200139
18 199035
19
The eighty years' crisis: International relations 1919-1999
199831
20 198929

About Ken Booth

Ken Booth is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 159 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (20 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (19 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (9 papers), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (9 papers), Maritime Security and History (8 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (8 papers), International Law and Human Rights (6 papers) and Global Security and Public Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (2.1k citations), Development (272 citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.2k citations), General Energy (33 citations) and Gender Studies (221 citations). Ken Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Steve Smith, Tim Dunne, Nicholas J. Wheeler, Michael Cox, Beth Fischer, Timothy Dunne, Michael Cox, Marysia Zalewski, John C. Campbell and Sandra Whitworth. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, International Relations, Review of International Studies, Pacific Affairs and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact