Ken Booth

5.9k citations
117 papers · 2.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Booth

100 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ken Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.5k
  • Development 197
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
  • General Energy 25
  • Gender Studies 166
Replace Gearóid Ó Tuathail with:
Gearóid Ó Tuathail United States
Barry R. Posen United States
Stephen M. Walt United States
Christian Reus‐Smit Australia
Ted Hopf United States
Mary Kaldor United Kingdom
Daniel H. Nexon United States
Thomas M. Franck United States
Daniel Byman United States
Hedley Bull Australia
Ken Booth relative to Gearóid Ó Tuathail United States Gearóid Ó Tuathail's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gearóid Ó Tuathail · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Booth. The network helps show where Ken Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Booth Line = papers co-authored together Ken Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991318
2 1994313
3 2007307
4 1996171
5 2005142
6 1982122
7 1991101
8 199573
9
Security and Self : Reflections of a Fallen Realist
199457
10 200751
11 200251
12
International relations theory today
199549
13 199235
14 200133
15 199527
16 198925
17
The eighty years' crisis: International relations 1919-1999
199824
18
Navies and foreign policy
197723
19 200822
20 198521

About Ken Booth

Ken Booth is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 117 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (12 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (11 papers), Maritime Security and History (7 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (6 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (6 papers), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (4 papers), International Law and Human Rights (4 papers) and Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.5k citations), Development (197 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.6k citations), General Energy (25 citations) and Gender Studies (166 citations). Ken Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Steve Smith, Tim Dunne, Nicholas J. Wheeler, Michael Cox, Beth Fischer, Timothy Dunne, Michael Cox, John C. Campbell, Marysia Zalewski and Sandra Whitworth. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, International Relations, Review of International Studies, Pacific Affairs and Civil Wars.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact