Kelly Raspberry
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
-
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Papers in
- Genetics 4
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 3
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 2
- Race, Genetics, and Society 2
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 4
- Co-authors
- Debra Skinner (5 shared papers)Raúl Caetano (3 shared papers)Catherine L. Clark (1 shared paper)Carol B. Cunradi (1 shared paper)John Schafer (1 shared paper)Karen E. Weck (1 shared paper)Natasha T. Strande (1 shared paper)Myra I. Roche (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sociology of Health & Illness (2 papers)Genetics in Medicine (1 paper)Medical Anthropology (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Interpersonal Violence (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Kelly Raspberry
9 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Health 102
- Genetics 124
- Clinical Psychology 72
- Gender Studies 30
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 52
Countries citing papers authored by Kelly Raspberry
This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Raspberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Raspberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Raspberry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kelly Raspberry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Raspberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Raspberry. The network helps show where Kelly Raspberry may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Kelly Raspberry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 121 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 |
About Kelly Raspberry
Kelly Raspberry is a scholar working on Genetics, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology and Safety Research, having authored 9 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers) and Race, Genetics, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (102 citations), Genetics (124 citations), Clinical Psychology (72 citations), Gender Studies (30 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (52 citations). Kelly Raspberry has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Debra Skinner, Raúl Caetano, Catherine L. Clark, Carol B. Cunradi, John Schafer, Karen E. Weck, Natasha T. Strande, Myra I. Roche, Jonathan S. Berg and James P. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology of Health & Illness, Genetics in Medicine, Medical Anthropology, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.