Kellie Ottoboni
Impact in
-
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Student Assessment and Feedback
Papers in
-
- Communication in Education and Healthcare 1
-
- Management and Marketing Education 1
- Co-authors
- Philip B. Stark (1 shared paper)Anne Boring (1 shared paper)Orianna DeMasi (1 shared paper)Andreas Zoglauer (1 shared paper)R. Stuart Geiger (1 shared paper)R. G. Barnes (1 shared paper)Stéfan van der Walt (1 shared paper)Diya Das (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)eScholarship (California Digital Library) (1 paper)SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (1 paper)London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kellie Ottoboni
3 papers receiving 14 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Public Administration 1
- Education 7
- Computer Science Applications 1
- Social Psychology 3
- Management of Technology and Innovation 1
Countries citing papers authored by Kellie Ottoboni
This map shows the geographic impact of Kellie Ottoboni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kellie Ottoboni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kellie Ottoboni more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kellie Ottoboni
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kellie Ottoboni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kellie Ottoboni. The network helps show where Kellie Ottoboni may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Kellie Ottoboni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors | 2016 | 11 |
| 2 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 3 | Classical Nonparametric Hypothesis Tests with Applications in Social Good | 2019 | 1 |
| 4 | 2020 | 1 |
About Kellie Ottoboni
Kellie Ottoboni is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics, Education and Statistics and Probability, having authored 4 papers that have together received 17 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Communication in Education and Healthcare (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (1 citation), Education (7 citations), Computer Science Applications (1 citation), Social Psychology (3 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (1 citation). Kellie Ottoboni has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip B. Stark, Anne Boring, Orianna DeMasi, Andreas Zoglauer, R. Stuart Geiger, R. G. Barnes, Stéfan van der Walt, Diya Das, Nelle Varoquaux and Marsha W Fenner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, eScholarship (California Digital Library), SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) and London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.