Keith Weghorst

460 citations
10 papers · 247 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Weghorst

8 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers

Keith Weghorst
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Development 48
  • Political Science and International Relations 141
  • Sociology and Political Science 184
  • Demography 35
  • Safety Research 20
Replace Scott A. Tyson with:
Scott A. Tyson United States
T. Y. Wang United States
Jeffrey Conroy-Krutz United States
Danielle F. Jung United States
Kevin S. Fridy United States
Janet I. Lewis United States
Kai Quek Hong Kong
Santiago Anria United States
Russell E. Lucas United States
Laura Neack United States
Keith Weghorst relative to Scott A. Tyson United States Scott A. Tyson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Scott A. Tyson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Weghorst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Weghorst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Weghorst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Weghorst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Weghorst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Weghorst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Weghorst. The network helps show where Keith Weghorst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Keith Weghorst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Weghorst Line = papers co-authored together Keith Weghorst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201393
2 201450
3 201142
4 201937
5
Are Swing Voters Instruments of Democracy or Farmers of Clientelism? Evidence from Ghana
20109
6 20228
7 20166
8
Effective Opposition Strategies: Collective Goods or Clientelism?
20112
9
APPP Working Paper No. 5. The role of private and collective goods in elections: evidence from Ghana.
20090
10
The role of private and collective goods in elections: evidence from Ghana
20090

About Keith Weghorst

Keith Weghorst is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Ocean Engineering and Safety Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Taxation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (1 paper), Corruption and Economic Development (1 paper), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (1 paper) and Water Governance and Infrastructure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (48 citations), Political Science and International Relations (141 citations), Sociology and Political Science (184 citations), Demography (35 citations) and Safety Research (20 citations). Keith Weghorst has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and India. Frequent co-authors include Staffan I. Lindberg, Michaël Bernhard and Eric Kramon. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, Democratization, Electoral Studies, Public Opinion Quarterly and Comparative Political Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact