Kai Quek

577 citations
29 papers · 251 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kai Quek

27 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Kai Quek
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Development 27
  • Political Science and International Relations 159
  • General Energy 4
  • Sociology and Political Science 161
  • Communication 21
Replace Danielle F. Jung with:
Danielle F. Jung United States
Janet I. Lewis United States
Erica D. Borghard United States
Scott A. Tyson United States
Theodor Tudoroiu Trinidad and Tobago
Tiberiu Dragu United States
Neil Ketchley United Kingdom
Alexander Lanoszka Canada
Alex Weisiger United States
Ben D. Mor Israel
Kai Quek relative to Danielle F. Jung United States Danielle F. Jung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Danielle F. Jung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kai Quek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kai Quek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kai Quek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kai Quek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kai Quek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kai Quek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kai Quek. The network helps show where Kai Quek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Kai Quek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kai Quek Line = papers co-authored together Kai Quek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201859
2 201726
3 201626
4 202124
5 201717
6 201814
7 201514
8 202214
9 202210
10 20207
11 20245
12 20245
13 20244
14 20234
15 20174
16 20213
17 20242
18 20152
19 20212
20 20162

About Kai Quek

Kai Quek is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research, Demography and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (15 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (11 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (5 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (3 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (27 citations), Political Science and International Relations (159 citations), General Energy (4 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations) and Communication (21 citations). Kai Quek has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Alastair Iain Johnston, Mark S. Bell, Yue Hou, David Andrew Singer, Courtney J. Fung, Enze Han, Austin Strange, Michael Sadler, Dan Altman and Ryan Brutger. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, Political Science Research and Methods, International Organization, Political Research Quarterly and Nations and Nationalism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact