Keith Smith

5.1k citations
36 papers · 306 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Smith

34 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Keith Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 128
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 46
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 22
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 26
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 21
Replace Milena Čukić with:
Milena Čukić Serbia
Siyi Tang United States
Marc-André Schulz Germany
Jessica Dafflon United Kingdom
Pamela K. Douglas United States
Britta Pester Germany
M. Jospin Spain
Ahmad Mheich France
Barbora Czippelová Slovakia
Shruti G. Vij United States
Keith Smith relative to Milena Čukić Serbia Milena Čukić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Milena Čukić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Smith. The network helps show where Keith Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Smith Line = papers co-authored together Keith Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198641
2 201731
3 201822
4 202020
5 201618
6 202216
7 201916
8 202116
9 202113
10 201510
11 20189
12 20169
13 20189
14 20209
15 20186
16 20206
17 20166
18 19956
19 20215
20 20215

About Keith Smith

Keith Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 36 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (17 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (128 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (46 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (22 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (26 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (21 citations). Keith Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Javier Escudero, Daniel Abásolo, Ron L. Evans, Mark E. Bastin, Simon R. Cox, Chao Tan, Feng Dong, Hamed Azami, Cathie Sudlow and Heather C. Whalley. Their work appears in journals such as JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Scientific Reports, Human Brain Mapping, Lupus and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact