Keith Smith

5.2k citations
39 papers · 354 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Smith

36 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Keith Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 140
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 35
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 40
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 24
Replace Min Lü with:
Min Lü China
Fang Han China
Jessica Dafflon United Kingdom
Tomas Watanabe United States
Srdjan Kesić Serbia
Scott Bonnette United States
Milena Čukić Serbia
Karin Schwab Germany
Pedro Omedas Spain
Tamanna T. K. Munia United States
Keith Smith relative to Min Lü China Min Lü's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Min Lü · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Smith. The network helps show where Keith Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Smith Line = papers co-authored together Keith Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198647
2 201734
3 201822
4 202021
5 201620
6 201919
7 202118
8 202217
9 202114
10 201511
11
202011
12 201810
13 201610
14 20189
15 20209
16
20199
17 20187
18 19957
19 20206
20 20186

About Keith Smith

Keith Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 39 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (140 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (35 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (40 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (24 citations). Keith Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Javier Escudero, Daniel Abásolo, Ron L. Evans, Mark E. Bastin, Simon R. Cox, Chao Tan, Feng Dong, Hamed Azami, Stewart Wiseman and Colin R. Buchanan. Their work appears in journals such as JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Human Brain Mapping, Scientific Reports, European Journal of Neuroscience and British Journal of Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact