Keith Happaney

1.2k citations
7 papers · 906 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Happaney

7 papers receiving 851 citations

Peers

Keith Happaney
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 270
  • Clinical Psychology 402
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 258
  • General Decision Sciences 22
Replace Joseph J. Plaud with:
Joseph J. Plaud United States
Cayce J. Hook United States
Emily C. Merz United States
Adriano Pagnin Italy
Gwenyth H. Edwards United States
Lori Metevia United States
Sally Ann Rhea United States
Edward M. Duncan United States
Isaac T. Petersen United States
Doreen Arcus United States
Keith Happaney relative to Joseph J. Plaud United States Joseph J. Plaud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joseph J. Plaud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Happaney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Happaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Happaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Happaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Happaney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Happaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Happaney. The network helps show where Keith Happaney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Keith Happaney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Happaney Line = papers co-authored together Keith Happaney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Keith Happaney

Keith Happaney is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper), Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper) and Spaceflight effects on biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (270 citations), Clinical Psychology (402 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (258 citations) and General Decision Sciences (22 citations). Keith Happaney has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip David Zelazo, Donaya Hongwanishkul, Daphne Blunt Bugental, Donald T. Stuss, Nicholas J. Wagner, Steven J. Holochwost, W. Roger Mills‐Koonce and Eleanor D. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Brain and Cognition, Developmental Science, Developmental Neuropsychology, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact