Keith Earle

48 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Keith Earle
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Biophysics 900
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 176
  • Spectroscopy 377
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 154
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 193
Replace Edward L. Cochran with:
Edward L. Cochran United States
Thomas Schmidt Germany
Wei Zhuang China
Alessandro Lunghi Ireland
Charles M. Cook United States
Claus Krieger Germany
A. E. Woodward United States
Takuya Minami United States
Michael D. Spencer United Kingdom
David Harker United States
Keith Earle relative to Edward L. Cochran United States Edward L. Cochran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Edward L. Cochran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Earle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Earle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Earle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Earle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Earle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Earle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Earle. The network helps show where Keith Earle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Earle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Earle Line = papers co-authored together Keith Earle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001284
2 1988101
3 201092
4 201490
5 199490
6 201287
7 201286
8 200671
9 199369
10 199367
11 201463
12 199760
13 200459
14 199651
15 200537
16 199835
17 200929
18 200027
19 199924
20
Mental toughness as a determinant of sport injury beliefs, pain and rehabilitation adherence
200621

About Keith Earle

Keith Earle is a scholar working on Biophysics, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electron Spin Resonance Studies (25 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (7 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (7 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers) and NMR spectroscopy and applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (900 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (176 citations), Spectroscopy (377 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (154 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (193 citations). Keith Earle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Jack H. Freed, Józef K. Mościcki, David E. Budil, Peter Clough, Antonio J. Costa‐Filho, Peter P. Borbat, William B. Lynch, D. S. Tipikin, Lee Crust and John L. Perry. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Review of Scientific Instruments and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact