Keith E. Instone

455 citations
29 papers · 336 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Keith E. Instone

29 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Keith E. Instone
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Human-Computer Interaction 117
  • Information Systems and Management 66
  • Computer Science Applications 34
  • Information Systems 127
  • Software 17
Replace Alistair Sutcliffe with:
Alistair Sutcliffe United Kingdom
Wolfgang Dzida Germany
Lynne Dunckley United Kingdom
Thomas Mahatody Madagascar
R. John Brockmann United States
Marilyn Hughes Blackmon United States
Nancy C. Goodwin United States
Mouldi Sagar France
Hartmut Obendorf Germany
Sandrine Balbo Australia
Keith E. Instone relative to Alistair Sutcliffe United Kingdom Alistair Sutcliffe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Alistair Sutcliffe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith E. Instone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith E. Instone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith E. Instone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith E. Instone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith E. Instone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith E. Instone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith E. Instone. The network helps show where Keith E. Instone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Keith E. Instone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith E. Instone Line = papers co-authored together Keith E. Instone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200354
2 199341
3 199236
4 201028
5 199324
6 199420
7 199218
8 199315
9 201013
10 200512
11 199611
12 19969
13 19948
14
Usability engineering for the Web
19977
15 20096
16 20106
17 19935
18 20054
19 20043
20 19943

About Keith E. Instone

Keith E. Instone is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management, Information Systems, Computer Science Applications and Communication, having authored 29 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers), Information Architecture and Usability (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (2 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (2 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (2 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (117 citations), Information Systems and Management (66 citations), Computer Science Applications (34 citations), Information Systems (127 citations) and Software (17 citations). Keith E. Instone has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Laura Marie Leventhal, Diane Schertler Rohlman, Andrea Resmini, Dezhi Wu, Murray Turoff, Il Im, Marilyn Mantei Tremaine, James Blustein, Susan M. Dray and Elizabeth A. Buie. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour and Information Technology, interactions, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, World Wide Web and Journal of Systems and Software.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact