Keith E. Hamm

798 citations
45 papers · 506 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Keith E. Hamm

39 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Keith E. Hamm
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Public Administration 80
  • Political Science and International Relations 355
  • Gender Studies 121
  • Strategy and Management 182
  • Law 82
Replace Wilhelm Bürklin with:
Wilhelm Bürklin Germany
Ondřej Císař Czechia
Wouter Veenendaal Netherlands
Richard W. Mansbach United States
Blair A. Ruble United States
Donald M. Snow United States
John M. Theilmann United States
James A. R. Nafziger United States
Carlos M. Vilas Argentina
De Wet South Africa
Keith E. Hamm relative to Wilhelm Bürklin Germany Wilhelm Bürklin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wilhelm Bürklin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith E. Hamm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith E. Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith E. Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith E. Hamm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith E. Hamm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith E. Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith E. Hamm. The network helps show where Keith E. Hamm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith E. Hamm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith E. Hamm Line = papers co-authored together Keith E. Hamm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197964
2 200759
3 198335
4 201131
5 198327
6 198325
7 198125
8 199222
9 199618
10 201015
11 202213
12 200912
13 199012
14 198611
15 198211
16 198011
17 198611
18 198611
19 199310
20 20049

About Keith E. Hamm

Keith E. Hamm is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Law, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (26 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (14 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (8 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (80 citations), Political Science and International Relations (355 citations), Gender Studies (121 citations), Strategy and Management (182 citations) and Law (82 citations). Keith E. Hamm has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Ronald D. Hedlund, R. Edward Hogan, Robert Harmel, Patricia K. Freeman, Robert M. Stein, Stephanie Shirley Post, Gary Moncrief, Charles G. Bell, Jon M. Erlandson and Michael J. Malbin. Their work appears in journals such as Legislative Studies Quarterly, The Journal of Politics, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, British Journal of Political Science and Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact