Keith E. Hamm

35 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

Keith E. Hamm
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Public Administration 78
  • Political Science and International Relations 336
  • Gender Studies 114
  • Strategy and Management 174
  • Law 77
Replace Barbara Coyle McCabe with:
Barbara Coyle McCabe United States
Jacob Aars Norway
Andrew Duff United Kingdom
Wouter P. Veenendaal Netherlands
Donald M. Snow United States
De Wet South Africa
John M. Theilmann United States
Thomas I. Cook United States
Yale H. Ferguson United States
John Davis United Kingdom
Keith E. Hamm relative to Barbara Coyle McCabe United States Barbara Coyle McCabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Barbara Coyle McCabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith E. Hamm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith E. Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith E. Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith E. Hamm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith E. Hamm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith E. Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith E. Hamm. The network helps show where Keith E. Hamm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith E. Hamm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith E. Hamm Line = papers co-authored together Keith E. Hamm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197962
2 200753
3 198336
4 201131
5 198325
6 198323
7 198123
8 199222
9 199618
10 202216
11 201015
12 199012
13 198612
14 198211
15 200911
16 198611
17 198611
18 198011
19 199310
20 20219

About Keith E. Hamm

Keith E. Hamm is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Public Administration, Communication and Law, having authored 39 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (21 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (13 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (78 citations), Political Science and International Relations (336 citations), Gender Studies (114 citations), Strategy and Management (174 citations) and Law (77 citations). Keith E. Hamm has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Ronald D. Hedlund, Robert Edward Hogan, Robert Harmel, Patricia K. Freeman, Robert M. Stein, Stephanie Shirley Post, GARY F. MONCRIEF, Charles G. Bell, Jon M. Erlandson and Katie M. Moriarty. Their work appears in journals such as Legislative Studies Quarterly, The Journal of Politics, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, British Journal of Political Science and Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact