Keith Beardmore

31 papers receiving 961 citations

Peers

Keith Beardmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 143
  • Computational Mechanics 248
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 2
  • Materials Chemistry 256
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 135
Replace Shoji Noda with:
Shoji Noda Japan
Margaret A. Frisch United States
Jiřı́ Novák Czechia
Paul T. Murray United States
G. Auvert France
J.-M. Gilles Belgium
Constantine Douketis Canada
Anastas A. Bukharaev Russia
Jihwa Lee South Korea
Bernard Bourguignon France
Keith Beardmore relative to Shoji Noda Japan Shoji Noda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Shoji Noda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Beardmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Beardmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Beardmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Beardmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Beardmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Beardmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Beardmore. The network helps show where Keith Beardmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Beardmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Beardmore Line = papers co-authored together Keith Beardmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999113
2 1998106
3 199681
4 199881
5 199767
6 200361
7 199857
8 199651
9 199548
10 199944
11 199642
12 199742
13 199523
14 199421
15 199420
16 199516
17 199916
18 200615
19 199613
20 199713

About Keith Beardmore

Keith Beardmore is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 983 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion-surface interactions and analysis (13 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (8 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (7 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (2 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (2 papers) and Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (143 citations), Computational Mechanics (248 citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (2 citations), Materials Chemistry (256 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (135 citations). Keith Beardmore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Niels Grønbech‐Jensen, Roger Smith, A. R. Bishop, Joel D. Kress, Philip A. Pincus, Gerhard Hummer, Atul N. Parikh, Basil I. Swanson, Roger P Webb and Xiangyang Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vacuum, Molecular Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Langmuir.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact