Keisuke Namba

431 citations
14 papers · 359 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Keisuke Namba

13 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Keisuke Namba
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 309
  • Materials Chemistry 129
  • Mechanics of Materials 61
  • Biomedical Engineering 105
  • Computational Mechanics 42
Replace M. Itano with:
M. Itano Japan
Kim Clay United Kingdom
S. Saloum Syria
В. А. Закревский Russia
M. Hopstaken Netherlands
Kenkichi Suzuki Japan
Р. А. Корнев Russia
U. Lambert Germany
William A. Kimes United States
K. Tsuji Japan
Keisuke Namba relative to M. Itano Japan M. Itano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Itano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keisuke Namba

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keisuke Namba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keisuke Namba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keisuke Namba more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keisuke Namba

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keisuke Namba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keisuke Namba. The network helps show where Keisuke Namba may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Keisuke Namba, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keisuke Namba Line = papers co-authored together Keisuke Namba links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200079
2 199968
3 199242
4 199439
5 199435
6 199331
7 199517
8 199411
9 19958
10 19828
11 19978
12 20027
13 20205
14 20151

About Keisuke Namba

Keisuke Namba is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 14 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (5 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (5 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (4 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (4 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (2 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (2 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (309 citations), Materials Chemistry (129 citations), Mechanics of Materials (61 citations), Biomedical Engineering (105 citations) and Computational Mechanics (42 citations). Keisuke Namba has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Taiwan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tatsuo Oomori, Mutumi Tuda, Kouichi Ono, Shigeki Nakayama, Kouichi Ono Kouichi Ono, S. Arimoto, Yoshihiko Toyoda, H. Namizaki, Takeshi Mori and Keiichiro Imura. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Scientific Reports, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Applied Surface Science and Journal of The Electrochemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact