Keaton Piper

589 citations
40 papers · 393 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
    • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases 2
    • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications 2

Keaton Piper

32 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers

Keaton Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Internal Medicine 44
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 20
  • Neurology 79
  • Surgery 101
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 49
Replace Redi Rahmani with:
Redi Rahmani United States
Jeffrey Sorenson United States
Jeffrey S. Pannell United States
Jae Hyeon Park South Korea
Vamsidhar Chavakula United States
Won Chul Shin South Korea
Ilko Maier Germany
Paolo Pieragnoli Italy
Takashi Unoki Japan
Terence Tan Australia
Keaton Piper relative to Redi Rahmani United States Redi Rahmani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Redi Rahmani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keaton Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keaton Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keaton Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keaton Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keaton Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keaton Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keaton Piper. The network helps show where Keaton Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keaton Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keaton Piper Line = papers co-authored together Keaton Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201660
2 201746
3 201744
4 201939
5 202233
6 201731
7 201917
8 202416
9 201915
10 202315
11
Adult Pre-Exercise Screening System (APSS)
201113
12 202312
13 20218
14 20236
15 20236
16 20235
17 20184
18 20223
19 20232
20 20202

About Keaton Piper

Keaton Piper is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (44 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (20 citations), Neurology (79 citations), Surgery (101 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (49 citations). Keaton Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Kristopher T. Kimmell, G. Edward Vates, Yan Michael Li, James Towner, Howard J. Silberstein, Samuel B. Tomlinson, Kevin A. Walter, Hanna Algattas, Walter C. Jean and Maxim Mokin. Their work appears in journals such as Operative Neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Review, Acta Neurochirurgica and The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact