K.C. Lim

1.1k citations
36 papers · 891 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

K.C. Lim

36 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

K.C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 373
  • Biomaterials 160
  • Organic Chemistry 331
  • Condensed Matter Physics 119
  • Microbiology 48
Replace Robert J. Plano with:
Robert J. Plano United States
Kevin P. Browne United States
K. Antonova Bulgaria
Mitsumasa Iwamoto Japan
Mrinal Thakur United States
K. Kubodera Japan
N.A. Cade United Kingdom
C. Lapersonne‐Meyer France
Thierry Barisien France
V. V. Lemanov Russia
K.C. Lim relative to Robert J. Plano United States Robert J. Plano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Robert J. Plano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.C. Lim. The network helps show where K.C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K.C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together K.C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985108
2 1993103
3 198387
4 198166
5 197851
6 198750
7 199346
8 198545
9 198341
10 198335
11 198433
12 198429
13 197828
14 197827
15 198424
16 198414
17 199712
18 198112
19 199310
20 19868

About K.C. Lim

K.C. Lim is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Spectroscopy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications (13 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (12 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (7 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (7 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (5 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (3 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (373 citations), Biomaterials (160 citations), Organic Chemistry (331 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (119 citations) and Microbiology (48 citations). K.C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include A. J. Heeger, John T. Ho, J. D. Margerum, A. J. Heeger, A. M. Lackner, C. R. Fincher, J. D. Thompson, Shin‐Tson Wu, S.A. Casalnuovo and A. Kapitulnik. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Liquid Crystals, Physics Letters A and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact