Katrin Hohl

24 papers receiving 890 citations

Peers

Katrin Hohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Gender Studies 205
  • Health 156
  • Political Science and International Relations 495
  • Law 80
  • Sociology and Political Science 145
Replace Thomas Crofts with:
Thomas Crofts Australia
Stuart Kirby United Kingdom
Sanja Milivojević Australia
Luke McNamara Australia
Christopher M. Donner United States
David A. Makin United States
J. Robert Lilly United States
Anne‐Marie McAlinden United Kingdom
Sarah Charman United Kingdom
Mary‐Kate Lizotte United States
Katrin Hohl relative to Thomas Crofts Australia Thomas Crofts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22×
Thomas Crofts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katrin Hohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katrin Hohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katrin Hohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katrin Hohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katrin Hohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katrin Hohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katrin Hohl. The network helps show where Katrin Hohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Katrin Hohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katrin Hohl Line = papers co-authored together Katrin Hohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015152
2 2012142
3 2016124
4 201094
5 200983
6 201579
7 200860
8 201231
9 200923
10 202223
11 201822
12 201221
13 201621
14 201619
15 202217
16 201412
17 202312
18 202410
19 20247
20 20254

About Katrin Hohl

Katrin Hohl is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Health, Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (16 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (12 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Risk Perception and Management (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (205 citations), Health (156 citations), Political Science and International Relations (495 citations), Law (80 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (145 citations). Katrin Hohl has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ben Bradford, Jonathan Jackson, Andy Myhill, Elizabeth A. Stanko, Betsy Stanko, GEORGE D. GASKELL, Stephen D. Farrall, Sarah MacQueen, Kelly Johnson and Donald Wunsch. Their work appears in journals such as Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, Criminology & Criminal Justice, The British Journal of Criminology, European Journal of Criminology and Violence Against Women.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact