Kathryn E. Smith

3.2k citations
116 papers · 2.4k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Kathryn E. Smith

112 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Kathryn E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Clinical Psychology 1.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 202
  • Applied Psychology 58
  • Pharmacy 21
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 68
Replace Li Cao with:
Li Cao United States
Stephanie E. Cassin Canada
Debra Lynn Safer United States
Paulo P. P. Machado Portugal
M Taylor United Kingdom
Leen Van Vlierberghe Belgium
Cristin D. Runfola United States
Katherine Schaumberg United States
Kristine H. Luce United States
Diane L. Spangler United States
Kathryn E. Smith relative to Li Cao United States Li Cao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Li Cao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn E. Smith. The network helps show where Kathryn E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathryn E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathryn E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Kathryn E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018138
2 2020124
3 2018120
4 2017105
5 201999
6 201894
7 201884
8 201977
9 201867
10 201960
11 201858
12 201955
13 201948
14 202048
15 201746
16 202046
17 201939
18 201737
19 201934
20 201731

About Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 116 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (100 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (5 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations), Applied Psychology (58 citations), Pharmacy (21 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (68 citations). Kathryn E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tyler B. Mason, Ross D. Crosby, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Jason M. Lavender, Scott G. Engel, Carol B. Peterson, Li Cao, Adrienne Sarah Juarascio, Lauren M. Schaefer and Scott J. Crow. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, Appetite, Eating Behaviors, Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity and Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact