Kathryn E. Smith

4.4k citations
152 papers · 3.2k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Kathryn E. Smith

145 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Kathryn E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
  • Applied Psychology 236
  • Biological Psychiatry 75
  • Pharmacy 122
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 346
Replace W. Brian Saunders with:
W. Brian Saunders United States
Grégory Lambert France
Yi‐Chun Yeh Taiwan
Masahiro Matsunaga Japan
Shadi Houshyar Australia
Brian N. Smith United States
William H. Reid United States
Armin Hartmann Germany
Malvin N. Janal United States
Qing Zhao China
Kathryn E. Smith relative to W. Brian Saunders United States W. Brian Saunders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
W. Brian Saunders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn E. Smith. The network helps show where Kathryn E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathryn E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathryn E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Kathryn E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 152 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017181
2 2018125
3 2020119
4 2018110
5 201795
6 201994
7 201890
8 201882
9 202177
10 201976
11 201770
12 201664
13 201861
14 200958
15 201856
16 201949
17 201349
18 201946
19 202045
20 201944

About Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Surgery, having authored 152 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (89 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (23 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (22 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (18 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers) and Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Applied Psychology (236 citations), Biological Psychiatry (75 citations), Pharmacy (122 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (346 citations). Kathryn E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tyler B. Mason, Ross D. Crosby, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Ken Gall, Jason M. Lavender, Scott G. Engel, Carol B. Peterson, Li Cao, David L. Safranski and Scott J. Crow. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, Appetite, Eating Behaviors, Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity and Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact