Kate Powell
Impact in
- Neurology top 10%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
- Oncology 5
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 4
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 4
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Michael Häusser (2 shared papers)Ian Duguid (2 shared papers)Alexandre Mathy (1 shared paper)Matteo Rizzi (4 shared papers)James Bainbridge (2 shared papers)Robin R. Ali (3 shared papers)Alexander J. Smith (2 shared papers)Joana Ribeiro (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (3 papers)Nature Communications (2 papers)Brain Research (2 papers)BMC Cancer (2 papers)Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kate Powell
21 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Neurology 107
- Sensory Systems 54
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 137
- Ophthalmology 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 79
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Powell
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Powell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Powell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Powell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Powell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Powell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Powell. The network helps show where Kate Powell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Powell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 3 |
About Kate Powell
Kate Powell is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (107 citations), Sensory Systems (54 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (137 citations), Ophthalmology (59 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (79 citations). Kate Powell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Häusser, Ian Duguid, Alexandre Mathy, Matteo Rizzi, James Bainbridge, Robin R. Ali, Alexander J. Smith, Joana Ribeiro, Paul Chadderton and Tiago Branco. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Nature Communications, Brain Research, BMC Cancer and Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.