Kate Irving

50 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Kate Irving
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 36
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 255
  • General Health Professions 278
  • Health 91
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 47
Replace Joseph P. Eimicke with:
Joseph P. Eimicke United States
Yelena Perkhounkova United States
Xi Vivien Wu Singapore
Andrea Gilmore‐Bykovskyi United States
Juleen Rodakowski United States
Ellen L. Brown United States
Kathleen Buckwalter United States
Henry O’Connell Ireland
Katie Maslow United States
Caroline Sutcliffe United Kingdom
Kate Irving relative to Joseph P. Eimicke United States Joseph P. Eimicke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Joseph P. Eimicke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Irving

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Irving's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Irving with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Irving more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Irving

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Irving. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Irving. The network helps show where Kate Irving may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Irving, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Irving Line = papers co-authored together Kate Irving links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004335
2 2018174
3 200893
4 201472
5 200566
6 201760
7 201639
8 201837
9 201733
10 200232
11 201927
12 201923
13 201722
14 201721
15 201920
16 200619
17 201219
18 200618
19 202017
20 201915

About Kate Irving

Kate Irving is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (36 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (255 citations), General Health Professions (278 citations), Health (91 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (47 citations). Kate Irving has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include François Berthézène, Jean‐Louis Terra, Philippe Moulin, Patrice Nony, Fabrice Bonnet, Manuel Gonçalves‐Pereira, Orazio Zanetti, Frans R.J. Verhey, Bob Woods and Anja Bieber. Their work appears in journals such as Aging & Mental Health, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Age and Ageing, Ageing and Society and Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact