Anja Bieber

1.2k citations
35 papers · 662 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anja Bieber

29 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Anja Bieber
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 334
  • General Health Professions 417
  • Health 68
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Clinical Psychology 111
Replace Hazel Morbey with:
Hazel Morbey United Kingdom
Tala Al‐Rousan United States
Tracey Williamson United Kingdom
Bjørg Th. Landmark Norway
Jan Delepeleire Belgium
Sharon W. Williams United States
Katharina Heimerl Austria
Kate-Ellen Elliott Australia
Lynn Friss Feinberg United States
Jean Kozak Canada
Anja Bieber relative to Hazel Morbey United Kingdom Hazel Morbey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Hazel Morbey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anja Bieber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anja Bieber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anja Bieber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anja Bieber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anja Bieber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anja Bieber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anja Bieber. The network helps show where Anja Bieber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anja Bieber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anja Bieber Line = papers co-authored together Anja Bieber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018172
2 201983
3 201757
4 201640
5 201639
6 201836
7 202022
8 201922
9 201721
10 201920
11 202119
12 201915
13 202015
14 202314
15 201912
16 202011
17 202110
18 20229
19 20218
20 20217

About Anja Bieber

Anja Bieber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (11 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (7 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (334 citations), General Health Professions (417 citations), Health (68 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations) and Clinical Psychology (111 citations). Anja Bieber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele Meyer, Astrid Stephan, Orazio Zanetti, Kate Irving, Manuel Gonçalves‐Pereira, Bob Woods, Frans R.J. Verhey, Louise Hopper, Elisa Portolani and Marjolein de Vugt. Their work appears in journals such as Aging & Mental Health, BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Health & Social Care in the Community.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact