Kate Farley
Impact in
- Conservation top 0.2%
- Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 5
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 3
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
- Co-authors
- Paul Wilson (5 shared papers)Liz Bickerdike (4 shared papers)Alison Booth (3 shared papers)Kath Wright (1 shared paper)Cathy Brennan (6 shared papers)Ian Watt (4 shared papers)Antonis Kourtidis (1 shared paper)Duncan Chambers (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Implementation Science (3 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Public Health (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Kate Farley
14 papers receiving 662 citations
Kate Farley's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Conservation 260
- Occupational Therapy 77
- General Health Professions 215
- Health 58
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Farley
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Farley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Farley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Farley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Farley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Farley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Farley. The network helps show where Kate Farley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Farley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 535 |
| 2 | A chemotherapy standard order form: preventing errors. | 1999 | 23 |
| 3 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 0 |
About Kate Farley
Kate Farley is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Conservation and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Oil and Gas Production Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (260 citations), Occupational Therapy (77 citations), General Health Professions (215 citations), Health (58 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations). Kate Farley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Wilson, Liz Bickerdike, Alison Booth, Kath Wright, Cathy Brennan, Ian Watt, Antonis Kourtidis, Duncan Chambers, Allan House and Carl Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Implementation Science, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Public Health and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.