Kate E. Williamson

30 papers receiving 743 citations

Peers

Kate E. Williamson
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Reproductive Medicine 56
  • Cancer Research 64
  • Surgery 179
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 93
Replace Paul Hodor with:
Paul Hodor United States
Claudia Rutz Germany
Brian D. Bennett United States
Jose Galindo United States
Camila M. Lopes‐Ramos United States
Maria Grazia Masiello Italy
Nigel T. Goode United Kingdom
Yasuharu Ninomiya Japan
Matthew T. Knuesel United States
Alejandra M. Vitale Argentina
Kate E. Williamson relative to Paul Hodor United States Paul Hodor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Paul Hodor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate E. Williamson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate E. Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate E. Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate E. Williamson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate E. Williamson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate E. Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate E. Williamson. The network helps show where Kate E. Williamson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate E. Williamson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate E. Williamson Line = papers co-authored together Kate E. Williamson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007160
2 200465
3 200460
4 200549
5 200648
6 200144
7 201136
8 200331
9 200128
10 201224
11 200423
12 199922
13 201222
14 200218
15 200517
16 201816
17 199413
18 200113
19
The need to embrace molecular profiling of tumor cells in prostate and bladder cancer.
200313
20 201311

About Kate E. Williamson

Kate E. Williamson is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (6 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Reproductive Medicine (56 citations), Cancer Research (64 citations), Surgery (179 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (93 citations). Kate E. Williamson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Johnston, Brian Duggan, Chris Watson, Peter W. Hamilton, Sheena Lewis, Neil McClure, Carmel McVicar, Perry Maxwell, Nagalingam Rajakumar and William Pavlosky. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, PLoS ONE, The Prostate, Molecular Imaging and Biology and Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact