Kate E. Cavanaugh

743 citations
10 papers · 591 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kate E. Cavanaugh

10 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers

Kate E. Cavanaugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 97
  • Cell Biology 195
  • Spectroscopy 67
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 38
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 40
Replace Gary R. Bright with:
Gary R. Bright United States
Tatsuki Kurokawa Japan
Ruth M. Darrow United States
Meng Jin United States
Henry C.-H. Law United States
Luı́s M. Rosário Portugal
Yong-Sheng Cheng China
J. Mark Quillan United States
Kamran Salim United Kingdom
A. -M. Rosengren Sweden
Kate E. Cavanaugh relative to Gary R. Bright United States Gary R. Bright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×62×
Gary R. Bright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate E. Cavanaugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate E. Cavanaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate E. Cavanaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate E. Cavanaugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate E. Cavanaugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate E. Cavanaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate E. Cavanaugh. The network helps show where Kate E. Cavanaugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Kate E. Cavanaugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate E. Cavanaugh Line = papers co-authored together Kate E. Cavanaugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2013215
2 2019105
3 201985
4 201673
5 201965
6 202222
7 202012
8 20209
9 20224
10 20201

About Kate E. Cavanaugh

Kate E. Cavanaugh is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pharmacology, Spectroscopy and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (6 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (1 paper), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (1 paper) and Caveolin-1 and cellular processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (97 citations), Cell Biology (195 citations), Spectroscopy (67 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (38 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (40 citations). Kate E. Cavanaugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Lise Gardel, Michael F. Staddon, Shiladitya Banerjee, Edwin Munro, Martha Hotz Vitaterna, Christopher B. Forsyth, Shiwen Song, Keith C. Summa, Ali Keshavarzian and Robin M. Voigt. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Cell, Current Biology, Biophysical Journal, Nature Methods and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact