Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

220.5k citations
3.2k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Aging top 2%
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
    • RNA Research and Splicing
    • RNA modifications and cancer
    • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms

Papers in

  • Aging 107
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 540
    • RNA Research and Splicing 335
    • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 330
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 311
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 288
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 242
    • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 237

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

3.2k papers receiving 215.5k citations

Peers

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Aging 4.1k
  • Molecular Biology 161.2k
  • Cancer Research 23.9k
  • Genetics 41.4k
  • Cell Biology 21.0k
Replace BioEssays with:
BioEssays United States
EMBO Reports United States
Methods United States
Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology United States
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology United States
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology United States
The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology United States
Trends in Genetics United States
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology United States
Cell Research China
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development relative to BioEssays United States BioEssays's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
BioEssays · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Genetics & Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development.

About Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

The 3.2k papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development in the last decades have received a total of 220.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development usually cover Aging (107 papers), Molecular Biology (2.5k papers), Genetics (769 papers), Cell Biology (305 papers) and Cancer Research (235 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (540 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (335 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (330 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (311 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (288 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (253 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (242 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (237 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development are Gregg L. Semenza, Paul Polakis, Chris J. Weston, Tony Kouzarides, Arian F. A. Smit, Shelley L. Berger, Christopher J. Marshall, Adrian Bird, Brigid L.M. Hogan and Lalage M. Wakefield.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact