Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

232.3k citations
3.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Aging top 2%
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
    • RNA Research and Splicing
    • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
    • RNA modifications and cancer
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms

Papers in

  • Aging 109
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 551
    • RNA Research and Splicing 338
    • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 330
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 311
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 289
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 242
    • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 237

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

3.2k papers receiving 225.1k citations

Peers

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Aging 4.2k
  • Molecular Biology 161.0k
  • Cancer Research 22.7k
  • Genetics 42.0k
  • Cell Biology 21.1k
Replace BioEssays with:
BioEssays United States
EMBO Reports United States
Methods United States
Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology United States
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology United States
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology United States
The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology United States
Trends in Genetics United States
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology United States
Cell Research China
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development relative to BioEssays United States BioEssays's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
BioEssays · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Genetics & Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development.

About Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

The 3.3k papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development in the last decades have received a total of 232.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development usually cover Aging (109 papers), Molecular Biology (2.6k papers), Genetics (767 papers), Cell Biology (305 papers) and Cancer Research (236 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (551 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (338 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (330 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (311 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (289 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (256 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (242 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (237 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development are Gregg L. Semenza, Paul Polakis, Chris J. Weston, Tony Kouzarides, Arian F. A. Smit, Shelley L. Berger, Margaret Buckingham, Christopher J. Marshall, Adrian Bird and Brigid L.M. Hogan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact