Kate Devine

1.8k citations
84 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Devine

68 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Kate Devine
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 586
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 350
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 204
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 79
  • Immunology 206
Replace Richard Bernhard Mayer with:
Richard Bernhard Mayer Austria
Bradley T Miller United States
George T. Lainas Greece
Ana L. Mauri Brazil
Kemal Özgür Türkiye
E.G. Papanikolaou Belgium
S. Nuojua-Huttunen Finland
Isaac Jacques Kadoch Canada
Anil Gudi United Kingdom
Juana Crespo Spain
Kate Devine relative to Richard Bernhard Mayer Austria Richard Bernhard Mayer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Richard Bernhard Mayer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Devine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Devine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Devine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Devine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Devine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Devine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Devine. The network helps show where Kate Devine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Devine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Devine Line = papers co-authored together Kate Devine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015160
2 201886
3 201575
4 201571
5 202057
6 202255
7 202146
8 202345
9 201641
10 201536
11 201736
12 202133
13 201623
14 201822
15 202022
16 202021
17 202220
18 201619
19 202219
20 202017

About Kate Devine

Kate Devine is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Immunology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (38 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (29 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (19 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (9 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (5 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (586 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (350 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (204 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (79 citations) and Immunology (206 citations). Kate Devine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Micah J. Hill, Alan H. DeCherney, E.A. Widra, K.S. Richter, Samad Jahandideh, Anthony M. Propst, Sunni L. Mumford, Jeffrey L. McKeeby, George Patounakis and M.W. Healy. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Reproductive BioMedicine Online and Human Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact