Kate Crookes

1.5k citations
35 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Crookes

32 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Kate Crookes
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 912
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 558
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 327
  • Social Psychology 119
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
Replace Stefan R. Schweinberger with:
Stefan R. Schweinberger Germany
I Bülthoff Germany
Kim M. Curby United States
Cindy M. Bukach United States
Nadine Kloth Australia
Jürgen M. Kaufmann Germany
Goedele Van Belle Belgium
Carl Gaspar United Kingdom
Mayu Nishimura United States
John Towler United Kingdom
Kate Crookes relative to Stefan R. Schweinberger Germany Stefan R. Schweinberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Stefan R. Schweinberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Crookes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Crookes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Crookes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Crookes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Crookes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Crookes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Crookes. The network helps show where Kate Crookes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Crookes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Crookes Line = papers co-authored together Kate Crookes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009195
2 2012163
3 201572
4 201567
5 201367
6 201760
7 201352
8 201952
9 201137
10 201636
11 202130
12 201330
13 200929
14 201719
15 201616
16 201716
17 201715
18 201412
19 201212
20 202011

About Kate Crookes

Kate Crookes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (26 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (14 papers), Face recognition and analysis (8 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers) and Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (912 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (558 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (327 citations), Social Psychology (119 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations). Kate Crookes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elinor McKone, William G. Hayward, Gillian Rhodes, Linda Jeffery, Daniel D. Dilks, Lulu Wan, Katherine J. Reynolds, Simone Favelle, Amy Dawel and Janet H. Hsiao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Cognition, Visual Cognition and British Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact