Kate Brian
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Papers in
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 3
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 2
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 1
- Ovarian function and disorders 1
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 3
- Co-authors
- David Miller (3 shared papers)Robert West (3 shared papers)Siladitya Bhattacharya (4 shared papers)Jackson Kirkman‐Brown (3 shared papers)Allan Pacey (3 shared papers)Richard Hooper (3 shared papers)Sheena Lewis (3 shared papers)Arri Coomarasamy (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Nursing (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (1 paper)Human Fertility (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kate Brian
10 papers receiving 155 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Reproductive Medicine 132
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 74
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 42
- Demography 9
- Physiology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Brian
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Brian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Brian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Brian more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Brian
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Brian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Brian. The network helps show where Kate Brian may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Brian, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 10 | Precious Babies: Pregnancy, Birth and Parenting after Infertility | 2011 | 1 |
| 11 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 |
About Kate Brian
Kate Brian is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Demography, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper) and Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (132 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (74 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (42 citations), Demography (9 citations) and Physiology (3 citations). Kate Brian has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Miller, Robert West, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Jackson Kirkman‐Brown, Allan Pacey, Richard Hooper, Sheena Lewis, Arri Coomarasamy, Daniel R. Brison and Gordon Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Clinical Nursing, The Lancet, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Human Fertility.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.