Kate Brain
Impact in
- Oncology top 5%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Cancer survivorship and care
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Paul Norman (4 shared papers)Fiona Wood (18 shared papers)Grace McCutchan (22 shared papers)Jonathon Gray (9 shared papers)Glyn Elwyn (6 shared papers)Adrian Edwards (6 shared papers)Lindsay Forbes (6 shared papers)Samantha L. Quaife (13 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (9 papers)Psycho-Oncology (9 papers)British Journal of Cancer (7 papers)Health Expectations (5 papers)Thorax (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Kate Brain
102 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Kate Brain's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Oncology 759
- General Health Professions 492
- Genetics 533
- Applied Psychology 75
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 384
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Brain
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Brain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Brain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Brain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Brain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Brain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Brain. The network helps show where Kate Brain may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Brain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 337 |
| 2 | 2013 | 167 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 145 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 110 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 105 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 97 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 96 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 91 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 89 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 71 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 69 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 68 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 67 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 65 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 55 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 53 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 43 |
About Kate Brain
Kate Brain is a scholar working on Genetics, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 104 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (32 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (18 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (14 papers), Family Support in Illness (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (4 papers) and Male Breast Health Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (759 citations), General Health Professions (492 citations), Genetics (533 citations), Applied Psychology (75 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (384 citations). Kate Brain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul Norman, Fiona Wood, Grace McCutchan, Jonathon Gray, Glyn Elwyn, Adrian Edwards, Lindsay Forbes, Samantha L. Quaife, Kate Lifford and David Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Psycho-Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Health Expectations and Thorax.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.