David Tomson
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 1
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 1
- Co-authors
- L Stobbart (1 shared paper)Adrian Edwards (1 shared paper)Natalie Joseph‐Williams (1 shared paper)Richard Thomson (1 shared paper)Amy Lloyd (1 shared paper)Glyn Elwyn (1 shared paper)Kate Brain (1 shared paper)Sheila Macphail (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Medical Education (1 paper)Implementation Science (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)Health Promotion International (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
David Tomson
8 papers receiving 478 citations
David Tomson's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- General Health Professions 238
- Applied Psychology 24
- Clinical Psychology 53
- Pharmacy 11
- Family Practice 4
Countries citing papers authored by David Tomson
This map shows the geographic impact of David Tomson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Tomson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Tomson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Tomson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Tomson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Tomson. The network helps show where David Tomson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Tomson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 337 |
| 2 | 2012 | 113 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 4 | Family systems ideas in the 10-minute consultation: using a reflecting partner or observing team in a surgery. | 1996 | 10 |
| 5 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | Barriers and Enabling Factors to Shared Decision Making in Primary Care for Mental Health Conditions | 2015 | 1 |
About David Tomson
David Tomson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Technology (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (238 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (53 citations), Pharmacy (11 citations) and Family Practice (4 citations). David Tomson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include L Stobbart, Adrian Edwards, Natalie Joseph‐Williams, Richard Thomson, Amy Lloyd, Glyn Elwyn, Kate Brain, Sheila Macphail, S Hennessy and Peter Bower. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, Implementation Science, The Lancet, Health Promotion International and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.