Karissa Fenwick

746 citations
33 papers · 452 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Karissa Fenwick

30 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Karissa Fenwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • General Health Professions 192
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Public Administration 9
Replace Nashwa Ibrahim with:
Nashwa Ibrahim Egypt
Cath Quinn United Kingdom
Charlotte Williamson United Kingdom
Laura L. Phillips United States
Carla Hilario Canada
Kay Wheat United Kingdom
Joanna MacDonald New Zealand
Nerida Joss Australia
Clark D. Campbell United States
Una Foye United Kingdom
Karissa Fenwick relative to Nashwa Ibrahim Egypt Nashwa Ibrahim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Nashwa Ibrahim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karissa Fenwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karissa Fenwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karissa Fenwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karissa Fenwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karissa Fenwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karissa Fenwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karissa Fenwick. The network helps show where Karissa Fenwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karissa Fenwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karissa Fenwick Line = papers co-authored together Karissa Fenwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201564
2 201543
3 202042
4 201538
5 201830
6 201728
7 201824
8 201822
9 201520
10 201416
11 201713
12 201413
13 201812
14 202111
15 202110
16 20159
17 20218
18 20198
19 20227
20 20226

About Karissa Fenwick

Karissa Fenwick is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (192 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations), Clinical Psychology (93 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations) and Public Administration (9 citations). Karissa Fenwick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Erick G. Guerrero, Gregory A. Aarons, John S. Brekke, Erin L. Kelly, Raymond W. Novaco, Michael S. Hurlburt, Rebecca Lengnick‐Hall, Yinfei Kong, Howard Padwa and Kim C. Brimhall. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Health Issues, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Implementation Science, Psychiatric Services and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact