Karen Messing

162 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Karen Messing
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 633
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 146
  • Pharmacology 901
  • Occupational Therapy 220
  • General Health Professions 1.3k
Replace Cécile R. L. Boot with:
Cécile R. L. Boot Netherlands
Ebbe Villadsen Denmark
Allard E. Dembe United States
Cheryl Haslam United Kingdom
Sandra Brouwer Netherlands
Emile Tompa Canada
Amanda Griffiths United Kingdom
Patricia M. McGovern United States
Tessa Keegel Australia
Vilma Sousa Santana Brazil
Karen Messing relative to Cécile R. L. Boot Netherlands Cécile R. L. Boot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Cécile R. L. Boot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen Messing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Messing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Messing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Messing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Messing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Messing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Messing. The network helps show where Karen Messing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karen Messing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karen Messing Line = papers co-authored together Karen Messing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003301
2 2005145
3 2009142
4 2009122
5
Evaluation of exposure data from men and women with the same job title.
1994111
6 2013105
7 200788
8 199884
9 199777
10 201076
11 198575
12 199872
13 199072
14 200171
15
Gender equality work and health: a review of the evidence.
200671
16 200669
17 200767
18 199263
19 199853
20 198750

About Karen Messing

Karen Messing is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pharmacology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 177 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (45 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (40 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (31 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (26 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (15 papers), Sex and Gender in Healthcare (13 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (12 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Practices (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (633 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (146 citations), Pharmacology (901 citations), Occupational Therapy (220 citations) and General Health Professions (1.3k citations). Karen Messing has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan Stock, France Tissot, Ana María Seifert, W. E. C. Bradley, Julie Courville, Jeanne Mager Stellman, Lucie Dumais, Katherine Lippel, Nicole Vézina and Stéphanie Premji. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Health Services, Applied Ergonomics, Ergonomics, Relations industrielles and Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact