Karen Lorimer

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Karen Lorimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Occupational Therapy 93
  • Internal Medicine 68
  • Rehabilitation 114
  • Microbiology 78
  • Pharmacy 45
Replace Flávia Falci Ercole with:
Flávia Falci Ercole Brazil
Lucila Amaral Carneiro Vianna Brazil
Lívia Moreira Barros Brazil
Max Kamien Australia
Sandra Campbell Australia
Eliane Ramos Pereira Brazil
Ana Luísa Brandão de Carvalho Lira Brazil
Lídya Tolstenko Nogueira Brazil
Marcia Killien United States
Helen M. Achat Australia
Karen Lorimer relative to Flávia Falci Ercole Brazil Flávia Falci Ercole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
Flávia Falci Ercole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen Lorimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Lorimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Lorimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Lorimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Lorimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Lorimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Lorimer. The network helps show where Karen Lorimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karen Lorimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karen Lorimer Line = papers co-authored together Karen Lorimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003230
2 201173
3 201568
4 201261
5 201950
6 200543
7 201639
8 200839
9 201338
10
Regional planning study. Assessing the population with leg and foot ulcers.
200135
11 200335
12 201532
13 200828
14 201628
15
Assessing venous ulcer population characteristics and practices in a home care community.
200325
16 201025
17 201022
18 201622
19 200921
20 201121

About Karen Lorimer

Karen Lorimer is a scholar working on Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (8 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (8 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (7 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (7 papers), Sex work and related issues (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (93 citations), Internal Medicine (68 citations), Rehabilitation (114 citations), Microbiology (78 citations) and Pharmacy (45 citations). Karen Lorimer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ian D. Graham, Margaret B. Harrison, Andrea R. Fisher, E Andrea Nelson, Paul Flowers, Lisa Margaret McDaid, Jamie Scott Frankis, Graham J. Hart, Paula Kate Lorgelly and Elaine Friedberg. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections, BMC Public Health, Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing, International Journal of STD & AIDS and Advances in Skin & Wound Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact