Kae Ito
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 14
-
- Frailty in Older Adults 4
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Shuichi Awata (26 shared papers)Tsuyoshi Okamura (25 shared papers)Chiaki Ura (13 shared papers)Hiroki Inagaki (21 shared papers)Fumiko Miyamae (13 shared papers)Mika Sugiyama (12 shared papers)Mutsuo Ijuin (6 shared papers)Naoko Sakuma (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Kae Ito
37 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 69
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
- Psychiatry and Mental health 120
- Health 31
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 14
Countries citing papers authored by Kae Ito
This map shows the geographic impact of Kae Ito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kae Ito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kae Ito more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kae Ito
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kae Ito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kae Ito. The network helps show where Kae Ito may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kae Ito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 14 | Reliability and validity of the Five Cognitive Test in the context of detecting older people with mild cognitive impairment living in the community | 2015 | 8 |
| 15 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 5 |
About Kae Ito
Kae Ito is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Demography and Health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (69 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations), Health (31 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (14 citations). Kae Ito has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, India and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Shuichi Awata, Tsuyoshi Okamura, Chiaki Ura, Hiroki Inagaki, Fumiko Miyamae, Mika Sugiyama, Mutsuo Ijuin, Naoko Sakuma, Kentaro Shimokado and Takahiro Haga. Their work appears in journals such as Geriatrics and gerontology international, Psychogeriatrics, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.