Kae Ito
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 10
- Homelessness and Social Issues 4
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 11
- Co-authors
- Shuichi Awata (21 shared papers)Tsuyoshi Okamura (21 shared papers)Mika Sugiyama (11 shared papers)Hiroki Inagaki (14 shared papers)Chiaki Ura (10 shared papers)Fumiko Miyamae (10 shared papers)Naoko Sakuma (7 shared papers)Mutsuo Ijuin (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Kae Ito
28 papers receiving 369 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 112
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
- Psychiatry and Mental health 156
- Health 68
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 17
Countries citing papers authored by Kae Ito
This map shows the geographic impact of Kae Ito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kae Ito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kae Ito more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kae Ito
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kae Ito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kae Ito. The network helps show where Kae Ito may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kae Ito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 4 | [Reliability and validity of the simplified Japanese version of the WHO-Five Well-being Index (S-WHO-5-J)]. | 2013 | 37 |
| 5 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 12 | Reliability and validity of the Five Cognitive Test in the context of detecting older people with mild cognitive impairment living in the community | 2015 | 7 |
| 13 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 3 |
About Kae Ito
Kae Ito is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Clinical Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (112 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (156 citations), Health (68 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (17 citations). Kae Ito has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, India and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Shuichi Awata, Tsuyoshi Okamura, Mika Sugiyama, Hiroki Inagaki, Chiaki Ura, Fumiko Miyamae, Naoko Sakuma, Mutsuo Ijuin, Masahiro Ono and Koichiro Tatsumi. Their work appears in journals such as Geriatrics and gerontology international, Psychogeriatrics, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, BMC Health Services Research and Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.