K. Schröder

501 citations
39 papers · 358 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

K. Schröder

37 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

K. Schröder
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Transplantation 54
  • Business and International Management 7
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 22
  • Nephrology 17
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 34
Replace Thomas Henne with:
Thomas Henne Germany
Valery Vilchez United States
Güldane Cengiz Seval Türkiye
Gail Miflin United Kingdom
Katie Connor United Kingdom
G. P. Summerfield United Kingdom
Susan Murray Ireland
M. Puntous France
B. Melosky Canada
Tamás Zelei Hungary
K. Schröder relative to Thomas Henne Germany Thomas Henne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Thomas Henne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Schröder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Schröder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Schröder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Schröder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Schröder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Schröder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Schröder. The network helps show where K. Schröder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Schröder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Schröder Line = papers co-authored together K. Schröder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200965
2 200243
3 202042
4 199427
5 197815
6 201714
7 198213
8 199813
9 197210
10 200310
11 201510
12
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-year trial to study the effect of nitrendipine on chronic renal transplant function.
19959
13 20118
14 20187
15 20226
16 20136
17 19666
18 19974
19 20094
20 20174

About K. Schröder

K. Schröder is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transplantation, Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 39 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (5 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (5 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (3 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Xenotransplantation and immune response (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (54 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (22 citations), Nephrology (17 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (34 citations). K. Schröder has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ricarda B. Bouncken, Victor Tiberius, Sascha Kraus, Gerhard A. Müller, Katharina Ahrens, Peter Bramlage, Michael Koziolek, Antonia Zapf, Carsten Bramlage and J Kaden. Their work appears in journals such as Der Ophthalmologe, Clinical Chemistry, Epilepsy Research, Oncogene and Journal of Molecular Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact