K. Peper

2.7k citations
39 papers · 2.5k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

K. Peper

38 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

K. Peper
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 803
  • Electrochemistry 208
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Bioengineering 110
Replace O. F. Hutter with:
O. F. Hutter United Kingdom
Jean‐Marc Dubois France
F. J. Brinley United States
Shigehiro Nakajima United States
Ted Begenisich United States
R. B. Rogart United States
Martin F. Schneider United States
C. L. Schauf United States
B. Neumcke Germany
Joshua R. Berlin United States
K. Peper relative to O. F. Hutter United Kingdom O. F. Hutter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
O. F. Hutter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Peper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Peper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Peper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Peper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Peper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Peper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Peper. The network helps show where K. Peper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Peper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Peper Line = papers co-authored together K. Peper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973205
2 1967152
3 1974149
4 1967142
5 1978140
6 1982139
7 1969122
8 1976102
9 197697
10 196795
11 197692
12 197491
13 196783
14 197278
15 196865
16 196663
17 197962
18 197261
19 197659
20 197556

About K. Peper

K. Peper is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cell Biology and Electrochemistry, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (23 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (10 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (5 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (803 citations), Electrochemistry (208 citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations) and Bioengineering (110 citations). K. Peper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Florian Dreyer, W. Trautwein, J. Dudél, C. Sandri, K. Akert, H. Moor, Raimund Sterz, Reinhardt Rüdel, Dieter Mascher and U.J. McMahan. Their work appears in journals such as Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Brain Research, Cell and Tissue Research, Nature and Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact