K. G. Mitchell

4.0k citations
164 papers · 2.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

K. G. Mitchell

151 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

K. G. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Animal Science and Zoology 685
  • Small Animals 310
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 548
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 173
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 104
Replace David Tivey with:
David Tivey Australia
Thomas Weber United States
M. C. Roberts United States
W.E. Parish United Kingdom
Rajat Gupta India
Myron A. Holscher United States
David J. Alexander United Kingdom
Cuong D. Tran Australia
Audrey K. Cook United States
Jody P. Lulıch United States
K. G. Mitchell relative to David Tivey Australia David Tivey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
David Tivey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. G. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. G. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. G. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. G. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. G. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. G. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. G. Mitchell. The network helps show where K. G. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. G. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. G. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together K. G. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 164 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1955105
2 196064
3 197061
4 201960
5 200558
6 201353
7 201944
8 197243
9
Analgesia by wound infiltration after surgical excision of benign breast lumps.
198542
10 196241
11 195640
12 200939
13 196136
14 201833
15 201932
16 197732
17 195532
18 201830
19 202229
20 198428

About K. G. Mitchell

K. G. Mitchell is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Small Animals and Oncology, having authored 164 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (52 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (21 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (20 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (19 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (16 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (15 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (14 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (685 citations), Small Animals (310 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (548 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (173 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (104 citations). K. G. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include R. Braude, R. S. Barber, Boris Sepesi, Mara B. Antonoff, Ara A. Vaporciyan, Reza J. Mehran, David C. Rice, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Stephen G. Swisher and I. G. Partridge. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal Of Nutrition, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Animal Science, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Journal of Dairy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact