Thomas Weber
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.2%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Small Animals top 1%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
-
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 24
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 16
- Oncology 16
- Co-authors
- B. J. Kerr (29 shared papers)Venkatesh Mani (3 shared papers)G. C. Shurson (10 shared papers)Cherie J. Ziemer (7 shared papers)John P. Cello (2 shared papers)W.A. Dozier (4 shared papers)M.T. Kidd (4 shared papers)Kristjan Bregendahl (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Animal Science (28 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (5 papers)Poultry Science (3 papers)Cancers (2 papers)Annals of Hematology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Weber
85 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Animal Science and Zoology 1.2k
- Small Animals 297
- Hepatology 246
- Aquatic Science 234
- Agronomy and Crop Science 209
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Weber
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Weber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Weber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Weber. The network helps show where Thomas Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 205 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 196 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 144 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 117 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 111 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 110 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 92 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 91 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 82 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 77 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 76 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 68 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 57 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 52 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 48 |
About Thomas Weber
Thomas Weber is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (24 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (16 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (4 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (1.2k citations), Small Animals (297 citations), Hepatology (246 citations), Aquatic Science (234 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (209 citations). Thomas Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include B. J. Kerr, Venkatesh Mani, G. C. Shurson, Cherie J. Ziemer, John P. Cello, W.A. Dozier, M.T. Kidd, Kristjan Bregendahl, Brian G. Bosworth and Nicholas K Gabler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Poultry Science, Cancers and Annals of Hematology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.